original problem( leaking gas line) was said to be completed but after driven for 40+ miles a leak re-occurred. After returning, the problem was determined to be a "leak" at a seam of the gas tank. In both situations the tank had to be removed. the first repair of the lines no indication was made that the tank was defective nor was a check made to that effect. the second leak occurred from my observation around the area where a new fuel filter was installed. When return was made to address the leak there was never any indication that it did in fact leak where I pointed out. all attention was turned to a "defective" tank. It seems unusual that there was never indication of a leaky tank when vehicle was first delivered for line repair, nor as stated above after line repair was completed. Question arises was tank damaged during some phase of the repair. An agreement was made tank would be changed and no labor paid, but I feel the tank price was inflated to cover part or all of the labor. Four different sources tank priced from $105 to 120 , I paid $200